<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Earnings on S3H.com</title>
    <link>https://s3h.com/tags/earnings/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Earnings on S3H.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://s3h.com/tags/earnings/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Amazon (AMZN) Up 8%, Apple (AAPL) Down 6%: AWS Grew 37% While Apple Guided Gross Margin Down to 47%</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/amazon-amzn-up-8-apple-aapl-down-6-aws-grew-37-while-apple-guided-gross-margin-down-to-47/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/amazon-amzn-up-8-apple-aapl-down-6-aws-grew-37-while-apple-guided-gross-margin-down-to-47/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Both companies beat on the top and bottom lines on Thursday evening. Amazon closed the regular session at $235.50 and traded up to roughly $252 after hours, a gain of about 7% at the print and 9% at the peak. Apple closed at $333.43 and traded down to roughly $312, a decline of more than 6%. The divergence had almost nothing to do with the quality of the two beats and almost everything to do with a single input cost that both companies discussed at length: DRAM.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IBM Falls 25% on a 3.7% Revenue Miss: The Market Repriced the Story, Not the Quarter</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/ibm-falls-25-on-a-3.7-revenue-miss-the-market-repriced-the-story-not-the-quarter/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/ibm-falls-25-on-a-3.7-revenue-miss-the-market-repriced-the-story-not-the-quarter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;IBM closed down 25.2% at $217.07 on July 14, the steepest single-day decline in the company&amp;rsquo;s history and the worst drop in records that run back to 1968 — worse than the 23.7% collapse of October 1987. Roughly $67 billion in market value evaporated on a preliminary second-quarter print that missed revenue by 3.7%. That gap between the size of the miss and the size of the reaction is the entire story. The market did not sell a quarter. It repriced the forward earnings stream.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
